<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Change to Natural Perfection Reverted</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.resto4life.com/2008/05/13/change-to-natural-perfection-reverted/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.resto4life.com/2008/05/13/change-to-natural-perfection-reverted/</link>
	<description>So many numbers, you'll think you're getting audited</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 06:30:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phaelia</title>
		<link>http://www.resto4life.com/2008/05/13/change-to-natural-perfection-reverted/comment-page-1/#comment-3793</link>
		<dc:creator>Phaelia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 15:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.resto4life.com/2008/05/13/change-to-natural-perfection-reverted/#comment-3793</guid>
		<description>@Sorayn: Are you asking me a question or is that hypothetical? I personally find it odd to try out a change on the PTR, rollback a portion of it, then release it to live without retesting. I can only assume they retested it internally, at the least.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Sorayn: Are you asking me a question or is that hypothetical? I personally find it odd to try out a change on the PTR, rollback a portion of it, then release it to live without retesting. I can only assume they retested it internally, at the least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sorayn</title>
		<link>http://www.resto4life.com/2008/05/13/change-to-natural-perfection-reverted/comment-page-1/#comment-3789</link>
		<dc:creator>Sorayn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 12:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.resto4life.com/2008/05/13/change-to-natural-perfection-reverted/#comment-3789</guid>
		<description>Given the scope of players as well as the time frames, can you come up with a better method of determining changes or game dynamics?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given the scope of players as well as the time frames, can you come up with a better method of determining changes or game dynamics?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaegor</title>
		<link>http://www.resto4life.com/2008/05/13/change-to-natural-perfection-reverted/comment-page-1/#comment-3774</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaegor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 18:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.resto4life.com/2008/05/13/change-to-natural-perfection-reverted/#comment-3774</guid>
		<description>FYI, Scare Beast had its range buffed to 30yds, but maintains its 1.5s cast time.

See the 2.4.2 patchnotes here:
http://www.worldofwarcraft.com/patchnotes/

This was confirmed by both Eyonix and Nethaera on the forums to be an intentional change. There is no intention of making Scare Beast an instant cast on Live Servers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI, Scare Beast had its range buffed to 30yds, but maintains its 1.5s cast time.</p>
<p>See the 2.4.2 patchnotes here:<br />
<a href="http://www.worldofwarcraft.com/patchnotes/" rel="nofollow">http://www.worldofwarcraft.com/patchnotes/</a></p>
<p>This was confirmed by both Eyonix and Nethaera on the forums to be an intentional change. There is no intention of making Scare Beast an instant cast on Live Servers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrige</title>
		<link>http://www.resto4life.com/2008/05/13/change-to-natural-perfection-reverted/comment-page-1/#comment-3770</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrige</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 17:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.resto4life.com/2008/05/13/change-to-natural-perfection-reverted/#comment-3770</guid>
		<description>They probably realized their blatant view on statistics couldn&#039;t justify nerfing this ability for Druids alone while other classes with the exact same mechanic weren&#039;t. Surprised they realized it though, they aren&#039;t exactly the guardians of morale (note: Scare Beast and Ferals)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They probably realized their blatant view on statistics couldn&#8217;t justify nerfing this ability for Druids alone while other classes with the exact same mechanic weren&#8217;t. Surprised they realized it though, they aren&#8217;t exactly the guardians of morale (note: Scare Beast and Ferals)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
